The Global History of Caricature: From Antiquity to the Digital Era

The Global History of Caricature: Caricature – the art of exaggerating or distorting a subject for comic or satirical effect – has a long and rich history across the world. From ancient stone carvings and scrolls to modern digital cartoons and memes, caricatures have served as mirrors of society, tools of political critique, and outlets for artistic humor. In this article, we trace the evolution of caricature from its earliest appearances in antiquity through the Renaissance birth of the genre, the golden age of satirical cartoons in the 18th and 19th centuries, the global proliferation of political cartoons in the 20th century, and finally into the contemporary digital landscape. Along the way we will encounter humorous pharaohs, grotesque Renaissance sketches, scathing newspaper cartoons that toppled corrupt bosses, and the latest online caricatures that spread virally. Each era and region put its own stamp on caricature, reflecting local culture and concerns. Despite changes in technique from ink on paper to pixels on screen, the core purpose of caricature remains constant: to amuse, to provoke thought, and often to speak truth to power through visual wit.

Early Caricature in Antiquity and the Middle Ages

Long before the word caricature was coined, artists in ancient civilizations were already poking fun at human foibles with exaggerated images. Ancient Egypt offers one of the earliest known examples of satirical art: a 3,000-year-old papyrus (often called the “Satirical Papyrus”) that shows animals acting like humans in absurd scenarios.¹ In this New Kingdom Egyptian scroll (c. 1100 BC), mice and cats play board games and perform human tasks – a clear parody of everyday life. Such whimsical inversions suggest that even in pharaonic times, artists lampooned society through comic analogies. The ancient Greeks and Romans also produced caricature-like imagery. Greek vase painters occasionally depicted grotesque, burlesque figures – for example, actors in comic plays or exaggerated caricatures of mythic creatures.² A famous piece of Roman graffiti from Pompeii shows a politician drawn with an oversized head and distorted features – essentially an ancient political cartoon scratched on a wall.

During the Middle Ages, comic distortion appeared in the margins of illuminated manuscripts and the carvings of medieval churches. Monks doodled grotesque faces and exaggerated scenes in manuscript margins, and stone carvers hid mocking figures in cathedral gargoyles and misericords. For example, Gothic church misericord seats might show a foolish monk with an outsized nose or animals dressed as people – a medieval visual satire of human folly. These images, often anonymous, served as humorous asides in otherwise serious contexts. In medieval Japan, roughly the same era saw the creation of the famous Chōjū-jinbutsu-giga or “Scrolls of Frolicking Animals” (12th–13th century). These scrolls, attributed to the monk Toba Sōjō, depict rabbits, frogs, and monkeys engaging in very human activities – wrestling, dancing, and even praying – drawn in lively brushstrokes.³⁴ The Choju-giga scrolls, rendered in simple black ink on paper, are often considered the earliest manga; they use animal caricatures to humorously critique aspects of human society in a “free and joyous” way. Across cultures in antiquity and the Middle Ages, we see the impulse to satirize through images – whether for simple amusement or subversive commentary – well before caricature became a defined art form.

Renaissance Origins of Caricature (15th–17th Centuries)

Caricature as we know it – a deliberately “loaded” portrait that exaggerates a person’s appearance for comic effect – took shape during the Renaissance. The very term caricature derives from the Italian caricare, meaning “to load” or exaggerate. Renaissance artists, with their keen interest in human anatomy and personality, began to play with distortion as an artistic experiment. Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) famously sketched grotesque heads of people with exaggerated noses, chins, and foreheads. Though Leonardo’s drawings were likely studies of human variety (and perhaps observations of how aging coins’ portraits became unintentionally caricatured over time, they mark an early attempt to capture a person’s essence by amplifying distinctive features. Similarly, Albrecht Dürer in Germany drew some exaggerated profiles around 1500, reflecting this growing Renaissance curiosity about physiognomy and distortion.

The first true caricatures – in the sense of satirical portraits of specific individuals – are often credited to the Carracci family in late 16th-century Italy. Annibale and Agostino Carracci, painters in Bologna, would sketch humorous distorted portraits of people in the street or fellow artists. By about 1590, Agostino Carracci had produced caricature drawings that intentionally “loaded” a person’s features to comic effect.⁵ This was a playful private art shared among artists. In the 17th century, caricature gained broader appreciation. The great Baroque sculptor Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598–1680) was also a skilled caricaturist who made lightning-quick ink sketches capturing nobles and churchmen with ridiculous exaggeration.⁶ Bernini even took the Italian idea of caricatura to France in 1665, astounding the court of Louis XIV with his witty portraits “showing the ugly and the ridiculous” sides of his subjects.⁷ With Bernini, caricature became not just an inside joke for artists but a fashionable amusement in high society.

By the late 1600s and early 1700s, caricature portraits were popular novelties in European aristocratic circles. Italy’s Pier Leone Ghezzi (1674–1755) drew humorous caricature profiles of Rome’s visitors, and travelers on the Grand Tour would bring home caricature sketches as souvenirs.⁸ The practice was essentially an 18th-century meme among elites, passed around for laughs.⁹ These early caricatures were usually gentle lampoons – an exaggerated nose here, a stretched neck there – more artistic whimsy than political commentary. Still, the groundwork was laid for caricature to move beyond the studio and salon and enter the public arena of print.

Notably, the word caricature itself was first recorded in print by Mozzini in 1646 and soon entered French and English vocabulary via Bernini’s influence.¹⁰ Caricature had arrived as a recognized concept: art that “sought the specific features of each individual” and rendered them in a witty, often comically “ugly” manner.¹¹ Renaissance and Baroque caricaturists proved that a few strokes of pen could capture a person’s essence more strikingly than a realistic portrait – a discovery that would revolutionize graphic satire in the centuries to come.

Satire and Social Critique in the 18th Century

The 18th century was a turning point that propelled caricature from private sketchbooks into the public sphere of mass communication. Several factors made this possible: the rise of print publishing (engravings, etchings, and later lithographs), a relatively free press in certain countries, and a public appetite for satirical commentary on the powerful. Nowhere did these forces converge more strongly than in Britain. Thanks to Britain’s liberal political climate and robust publishing industry, London became a hotbed for the development of modern caricature. Artists like William Hogarth (1697–1764) pioneered satirical art that reached a broad audience. Hogarth’s engravings – such as A Rake’s Progress – were moralistic comic scenes rather than individual caricatures, but he consciously distinguished between “character” and “caricatura” in art. In 1743, Hogarth even published a print Characters and Caricaturas to explain the difference: a “character” portrait captures typical features realistically, while a “caricatura” goes for deliberate exaggeration and absurdity.¹²¹³ Hogarth, though wary of vulgar caricature, “elevated satirical art into an accepted art form”, setting the stage for the next generation.

In the late 1700s, British caricature entered a golden age with artists who unabashedly skewered public figures. Chief among them was James Gillray (1756–1815), often dubbed the “father of the political cartoon.” Gillray’s prodigious output of hand-colored etchings mercilessly lampooned kings, politicians, and societal trends. London print shops displayed his latest work in their windows, where crowds gathered to laugh and gossip.¹⁴ Caricature had become a weapon of political campaigning: during the 1784 Westminster election, Gillray and his colleague Thomas Rowlandson were hired guns, using outrageous prints to sway public opinion. Gillray in particular perfected the art of the visual metaphor – turning countries and leaders into grotesque symbols. In his most famous print, “The Plumb-Pudding in Danger” (1805), he portrays British Prime Minister William Pitt and French Emperor Napoleon carving up the globe as if it were a plum pudding. Pitt takes an absurdly large slice of ocean (symbolizing Britain’s naval empire) while a bite-sized Napoleon slices off Europe.¹⁵ Both figures are drawn with exaggeration: Pitt elongated and almost skeletal, Napoleon short with a “beak-like nose and manic expression,” each obliviously indulging their imperial greed.¹⁶ Gillray’s genius was to encapsulate an entire geopolitical situation in one humorous, biting image – a form of commentary far more immediate than written editorials.

London’s vibrant print culture meant these satirical caricatures spread widely. They were sold as prints, reprinted in newspapers, and discussed in coffee houses and taverns.¹⁷ Across the English Channel, caricature also emerged in France, though often under heavier censorship. During the lead-up to the French Revolution, cartoons mocking the decadence of the monarchy circulated semi-clandestinely. Later, in the 1790s–1810s, French artists like Honoré Daumier would follow Gillray’s lead (we’ll revisit Daumier shortly). The popularity of caricature in England also influenced early American cartoons. The first known North American caricatures were drawn in 1759 by Brig. General George Townshend, depicting his rival General Wolfe in a deformed, hideous manner to amuse fellow officers during the Quebec campaign. And in 1754, Benjamin Franklin’s famous “Join, or Die” woodcut of a snake chopped into pieces – arguably America’s first political cartoon – used a striking visual analogy rather than exaggerated facial features, but it set the tone for using images in political messaging. By century’s end, caricature had firmly established itself as a “valuable tool for political campaigning” and public debate in Britain and beyond. The power of a cartoon to influence opinion was now evident; as Gillray’s contemporary observed, his caricatures were “famous across Europe” and could make or break reputations.

The 19th Century: Golden Age of Satire and Global Spread

Caricature flourished like never before in the 19th century, aided by technological advances and a hunger for satire in an era of rapid social and political change. The invention of lithography around 1796 revolutionized cartooning by making it easier to print drawings with fluid lines and shading. This enabled artists to produce more natural, expressive caricatures in mass quantity. In Paris, under the more liberal climate of the 1830 Revolution, caricature magazines bloomed. The publisher Charles Philipon founded La Caricature and Le Charivari, employing brilliant artists like Honoré Daumier (1808–1879) to target the July Monarchy of King Louis-Philippe. When direct portrayal of the king was banned, Philipon conceived a clever metaphor: he famously drew a sequence of sketches transforming Louis-Philippe’s face into a pear. In this 1831 “metamorphosis” caricature, each drawing becomes progressively more pear-shaped until the final image is simply a big pear – a jab at the king’s pear-like head and a pun (in French poire means both pear and fool). For this insolence, Philipon was prosecuted, but he argued in court that if a pear could resemble the king, anything could – highlighting the absurdity of censorship. The incident only fanned the flames: Philipon’s pear symbol became a viral meme of its time, repeatedly printed and plastered around Paris as a symbol of resistance. Daumier took up the pear motif in his lithographs, and in one notorious caricature titled Gargantua (1831), he depicted Louis-Philippe as the giant Gargantua devouring sacks of taxpayers’ money – a biting image that landed Daumier in prison for six months. Caricature in France had become downright subversive, a means to “laugh at tyrants” and rally public outrage under the guise of humor.

Meanwhile, Great Britain continued its satire boom. In 1841 the weekly magazine Punch was founded in London, coining the modern use of the word “cartoon” for its satirical drawings. Punch and its artists – notably John Tenniel (1820–1914) – became famous for gentle but pointed social and political caricatures. Tenniel’s “Dropping the Pilot” (1890), for example, poignantly caricatured Chancellor Bismarck as a departing ship’s pilot after his dismissal by Kaiser Wilhelm, in an image that required no grotesque distortion but captured the political drama symbolically. At the same time, more savage caricature continued in print shops and newspapers. The London Vanity Fair (1868–1914) published lavish full-color caricature portraits of celebrities (drawn by artists like Carlo Pellegrini, alias “Ape”) – these big-headed, tiny-bodied caricatures of politicians, writers, and royals were so popular that people would frame them on their walls.²⁰ By the late 1800s, caricature was everywhere in British visual culture: from the penny press to fine art exhibitions. A leading caricaturist of the era, Sir Max Beerbohm (1872–1956), elevated caricature to an art form exhibited in galleries, with his elegant ink portraits of Victorian personalities featuring outsized heads and wittily observed traits.²¹²²

Across the Atlantic, the United States developed its own robust cartoon tradition in the 19th century. Thomas Nast (1840–1902) of Harper’s Weekly became a scourge of corrupt politicians during the 1870s. Nast’s cartoons, rendered as bold wood engravings, attacked New York’s Tammany Hall machine with such “ruinous attacks” that he contributed to the downfall of Boss Tweed.²³ He also introduced enduring symbols through caricature – the Democratic donkey and Republican elephant in U.S. politics are credited to Nast’s pen.²⁴ American humor magazines like Puck (founded 1876) further spread the art, employing lithographers like Joseph Keppler to produce colorful satirical cartoons on current events.²⁵ By the 1890s, newspapers around the world featured regular editorial cartoons. In continental Europe, publications such as Kladderadatsch in Germany and L’Assiette au Beurre in France pushed caricature in new artistic directions, sometimes with radical political stances. Even in repressive regimes, caricature found a way: e.g. satirical magazines emerged in the Ottoman Empire and Qajar Persia in the late 19th century, often started by exiles or reformists who imported European cartoon styles to critique local authorities. Caricature had truly gone global – wherever newspapers went, cartoonists followed. In Japan, after the Meiji Restoration, European-style political cartoons were introduced (the magazine Japan Punch was founded by a foreign artist in Yokohama in 1860s, and soon Japanese cartoonists like Kiyochika began creating local satire). India saw early caricatures in journals by the 1870s–1880s, sometimes produced by English editors lampooning colonial politics, which gradually inspired Indian cartoonists in the independence movement. By 1900, one could find caricaturists plying their trade in Cairo, Mexico City, Tehran, and beyond – a truly international art form had been born out of the 19th-century enthusiasm for illustrated satire.

Importantly, the 19th century also witnessed the crystallization of caricature’s social function. Satire was now recognized as a powerful force: cartoonists could mock the vanity of the famous or wound them with scathing ridicule, depending on their intent.²⁶ As one British caricaturist, Ted Harrison, noted, a caricature could be a light-hearted entertainment or “employed to make a serious social or political point”.²⁷ The caricaturist’s pen could elicit a smile – or spark a revolution. Little wonder that many 19th-century rulers tried (often in vain) to censor or suppress caricatures. Yet the form proved irrepressible, thriving on the very controversies it created. By 1900, caricature had become, in effect, a global lingua franca of dissent and humor.

The 20th Century: Caricature’s Political Power and Pop Culture

If the 19th century established caricature in print, the 20th century magnified its reach through newspapers, mass media, and eventually digital networks. Political cartoons – essentially caricatures with a message – became staple features of daily journalism worldwide. In democracies, editorial cartoonists assumed the role of visual commentators, often wielding influence comparable to columnists. In authoritarian contexts, cartoonists used subtle metaphor or faced peril for more overt critiques. The century also saw caricature expand into new mediums like film and television animation, while continuing as a popular art in magazines and advertising.

In the early 1900s, cartoonists like Louis Raemaekers of the Netherlands gained international fame for their World War I cartoons that caricatured enemy leaders as barbaric (or ally leaders as heroic). The two World Wars generated a vast output of propaganda caricatures: posters and cartoons demonizing the enemy with beastly features were common on all sides. For example, Allied propaganda in WWI depicted the German Kaiser as an ape or octopus, while Nazi propaganda in WWII infamously caricatured Jews in vile, dehumanizing ways – a dark reminder that caricature’s power to influence can be used for evil as well as for good. Yet political caricature also rallied populations against tyranny: British cartoonist David Low drew memorable WWII cartoons ridiculing Hitler and Mussolini (such as the 1939 “Rendezvous” cartoon, showing Hitler and Stalin bowing politely after together carving up Poland – an echo of Gillray’s globe-carving metaphor) that enraged the Führer but delighted the public. Low’s style, with relatively realistic but biting likenesses, showed that a cartoon could strike nerves at the highest levels. American cartoonist Herbert Block (“Herblock”) skewered Senator McCarthy with the phrase “McCarthyism” and images like a demagogic witch-hunter, contributing to the eventual public backlash.²⁸²⁹ Around the world, from Latin America to South Asia, editorial cartoonists emerged as folk heroes for criticizing corruption and authoritarianism with humor and courage. In India, Shankar Pillai and later R. K. Laxman made the common man’s voice heard through daily pocket cartoons; in the Arab world, cartoonists like Naj al-Ali (creator of Handala) satirized dictators and championed the oppressed.

Caricature also entered popular culture more broadly. Magazines such as The New Yorker (founded 1925) became known for their sophisticated caricature illustrations by artists like Peter Arno and later David Levine, who drew literary and political figures with exaggerated heads and subtle wit. Caricatures of celebrities became a form of flattery as much as satire – Broadway stars, athletes, and movie actors often sat for caricature portraits (e.g. Al Hirschfeld’s famous line drawings of theater actors with hidden “NINA” messages). Caricature even influenced high art movements: the grotesque, exaggerated faces in the paintings of Expressionists like George Grosz and Otto Dix in 1920s Germany were essentially caricatures conveying the moral decay of society. Comic strips and animated cartoons also borrowed caricature techniques. Walt Disney’s and Warner Bros.’ cartoon characters often caricatured Hollywood actors or politicians for comedic cameos. The idea that a person could be reduced to a few exaggerated traits became fundamental to animation design and comic illustration.

By mid-century, the professional status of cartoonists was solidified. Prestigious awards (the Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Cartooning, established in 1922) recognized their impact. Yet, cartooning could be deadly serious: several cartoonists were jailed or exiled by repressive regimes. During the Cold War, caricature was a frontline weapon of propaganda on both sides. A single cartoon – say, depicting nuclear war planners as crazed caricatures – could encapsulate the absurdity of the arms race more effectively than any essay. Caricature’s capacity to simplify and dramatize made it a potent tool in the age of mass communication.

Caricature in the Digital Era: A Global Village of Satires

The late 20th and early 21st centuries have brought caricature into the digital realm, amplifying its reach and evolving its form. With the advent of the internet, caricatures now circulate at the speed of clicks. Memes and social media have turned almost everyone into a potential caricaturist – simply by photoshop distortions, face-swapping apps, or quick doodles, individuals can create and share biting visuals of public figures to a global audience. The essence of caricature – capturing a recognizable likeness with a twist – fits perfectly in today’s visual, attention-short media landscape.

Traditional editorial cartooning is still very much alive in newspapers and news sites around the world, but now those cartoons are immediately tweeted, emailed, and reposted far beyond their original print circulation. A witty cartoon from a Kenyan or Indian newspaper can go viral internationally if its theme resonates. Caricature has also entered new spaces: television satire (for example, puppet shows like Spitting Image in the UK or animated satire like South Park in the US) uses caricatured likenesses and exaggerated personas of real people for comedic effect. These shows essentially create living caricatures of politicians and celebrities, extending the art into performance.

Digital illustration tools have given today’s caricature artists new techniques. Many caricaturists now draw on tablets with digital pens, allowing for vibrant colors and wild effects that traditional ink and watercolor limited. Some create 3D caricatures or use animation, bringing caricatures to life in short videos or GIFs. Yet the fundamental skill remains what it was in Daumier’s or Nast’s day: keen observation of a subject’s features and personality, and the creativity to exaggerate those in a clever, meaningful way. One modern digital caricaturist might paint a hyper-realistic yet comically distorted portrait of, say, a tech CEO, and post it online to prompt discussion about Big Tech’s power. Another might produce a simple internet meme – a manipulated photo or cartoon mashup – that caricatures a world leader as a movie villain, and that meme might spread to millions of viewers overnight.

Caricature in the digital age can be edgier and more democratized, but it also faces new challenges. The global reach of a caricature means it can spark international controversy in seconds. In recent decades, we have seen how caricatures can ignite conflict: for instance, caricatures of religious figures published in Europe led to protests and even violence across continents. In 2005, Danish newspaper cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad (intended as commentary on self-censorship) triggered a worldwide debate on free speech versus blasphemy, demonstrating that a caricature drawn in one cultural context may be received very differently in another. The tragic 2015 attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo – known for its extreme caricatures – underscored that caricaturists are still risking their lives as they push boundaries. Thus, the role of caricature as a provocative force in society remains as significant as ever.

On a more lighthearted note, the digital era has also seen caricature embraced as entertainment on a mass scale. Political cartoon segments are regular features of news programs. Online “cartoonizers” allow users to turn their own selfies into caricatures. And caricature artists continue to be popular attractions at fairs and events, sketching quick, big-headed portraits that people share on Instagram. In a sense, caricature has come full circle to its convivial roots – a mix of jest, art, and social commentary accessible to all.

Despite new mediums, the social function of caricature endures. Caricatures still serve to “sharpen the public view” of events and leaders, as Britannica once noted.³⁰ They compress complex issues into instantly graspable images, often with humor as the sugar coating for serious critique. Whether drawn on a cave wall, printed in a pamphlet, or rendered on a smartphone screen, caricatures reflect the truths and follies of their times. They allow us to laugh at authority, recognize our own prejudices, or simply delight in the artistic joke of seeing a familiar face transformed. In this globally connected era, caricature has become a universal visual language – an exaggerated face that anyone, anywhere can understand at a glance.

The Global History of Caricature

From the playful animal satires of ancient Egypt and Japan, to the scathing political cartoons of revolutionary Europe, to the viral caricature memes of today, the art of caricature has proven remarkably adaptable and enduring. Each epoch and culture reinvented caricature to serve its needs – as comedic relief, as pointed social satire, as revolutionary propaganda, or as popular art. The evolution of techniques (etching, lithography, digital painting) expanded the possibilities of the form, but at heart caricature remains about observing the human face and condition with a mix of insight and irreverence. The power of caricature lies in its simplicity: by exaggerating what is distinctive, it can reveal deeper truths. A big nose might hint at big vanity; a tiny figure might critique outsized ambition. Kings, emperors, and tycoons who might ignore a written rebuke have often felt the sting of a well-drawn caricature that makes them look ridiculous to the public.

Caricature is often called the “people’s art” because it speaks in a democratic, uncensored voice – one that rulers and elites historically could not entirely silence. It thrives on freedom of expression (flourishing in periods and places where speech is freer) and often helps win greater freedoms by exposing injustice and absurdity to ridicule. At the same time, caricatures have occasionally propagated stereotypes and hatred, reminding us that this art form’s influence is double-edged. Yet, at its best, caricature punches up against bullies and pretension, giving us a laugh and a lesson in humility.

In our present moment, flooded with images, caricature competes with countless other visuals – but it continues to stand out. A clever caricature cutting through the noise on social media can become the icon of a movement or the emblem of a public sentiment (much as Gillray’s or Philipon’s images did in their day). As long as humans have the capacity to laugh – and to recognize ourselves and our leaders in exaggerated reflections – caricature will remain alive. It evolves with technology and culture, but its spirit is timeless. The faces may change, the mediums may shift, but somewhere an artist will always be doodling a crooked nose or an oversized head, and making someone, somewhere, smile knowingly at it. Such is the enduring global history of caricature – an art form that, by enlarging our features, has helped open our eyes.

Sources

1. (PDF) The Symbolism and Evolution of Satirical Art ↩︎
2. Caricature and cartoon | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica ↩︎
3. Curiously Drawn: 900 Year Old Animal Caricatures by Toba Sojo ↩︎
4. Monkeys Praying and Rabbits Wrestling, Choju Giga Picture Scroll ↩︎
5. Caricature and cartoon | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica ↩︎
6. A brief history of caricature – chapter twoBlog di ODDONKEY by MARZIO MARIANIMarzio Mariani ↩︎
7. A brief history of caricature – chapter twoBlog di ODDONKEY by MARZIO MARIANIMarzio Mariani ↩︎
8. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
9. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
10. Caricature and cartoon | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica ↩︎
11. A brief history of caricature – chapter twoBlog di ODDONKEY by MARZIO MARIANIMarzio Mariani ↩︎
12. Characters and Caricaturas – Brooklyn Museum ↩︎
13. Characters and Caricaturas, 1743 – National Gallery of Art ↩︎
14. The Plumb-Pudding in Danger – Age of Revolution ↩︎
15. The Plumb-Pudding in Danger – Age of Revolution ↩︎
16. The Plumb-Pudding in Danger – Age of Revolution ↩︎
17. The Plumb-Pudding in Danger – Age of Revolution ↩︎
18. Of Pears and Kings — The Public Domain Review ↩︎
19. Of Pears and Kings — The Public Domain Review ↩︎
20. Caricature and cartoon – Late 19th Century | Britannica ↩︎
21. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
22. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
23. Caricature and cartoon – Late 19th Century | Britannica ↩︎
24. Caricature and cartoon – Late 19th Century | Britannica ↩︎
25. Caricature and cartoon – Late 19th Century | Britannica ↩︎
26. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
27. Caricature – Wikipedia ↩︎
28. (PDF) The Symbolism and Evolution of Satirical Art ↩︎
29. (PDF) The Symbolism and Evolution of Satirical Art ↩︎
30. Caricature and cartoon | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica ↩︎